<p dir="ltr">The credibility of sources, including environmental health (EH) specialists such as scientists, researchers, or educators, plays a crucial role in shaping public opinions. A key component of source credibility is goodwill, which reflects the perception that a source is unbiased or driven by a commitment to the public good. Audiences skeptical of a source's credibility are more inclined to dismiss their messages and disregard their recommendations. Therefore, effective communication of science-based findings by EH specialists is essential for these findings to be actionable and contribute to promoting healthy lives. In partnership with the Texas A&M Center for Environmental Health Research (TiCER), the study aims to explore the factors influencing goodwill and source credibility and examine how signaling goodwill impacts the source credibility of environmental health specialists.</p>
Funding
DHHS-NIH-National Institute of Environmental Health Science
CAREER: Assessing the effect of source credibility on public perceptions of science and place-based conservation
Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
[File 1] - Survey2805.csv - [Processed dataset containing 2805 respondents with individual survey items]
[File 2] - MetadataSurvey1.0.xlsx - [Metadata containing survey questions, codes, and scales corresponding to the dataset in File 1 in the order the survey questions were asked.]